Anti-choice extremists target Trudeau and women’s reproductive rights

Warning: While necessary to the content of the piece, this post contains some disturbing and very graphic images. 

The extremist anti-abortion group, the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform, (CCBR) has been distributing leaflets and demonstrating around Toronto lately. Recently they targeted my west Toronto neighbourhood of South Etobicoke both distributing their leaflets door-to-door and demonstrating at a local intersection as well as, disgracefully given the imagery they use, outside of a local high school.

Their leaflets are grotesque and profoundly misrepresent abortion in Canada, a point to which we will return. They also specifically target Liberal leader Justin Trudeau — and it is no coincidence that they are being sent out in a riding that is held by a Conservative but that has more often gone Liberal in the past few elections both provincially and federally.

Justin Trudeau, in one of his finer moments as Liberal leader, made the party explicitly and unequivocally pro-choice. In 2014 he stated:

“I have made it clear that future candidates need to be completely understanding that they will be expected to vote pro-choice on any bills,” Mr. Trudeau said Wednesday, a day before a major anti-abortion rally is set to take place on Parliament Hill. “… For me, it’s a debate that has been settled for the vast majority of Canadians and we don’t need to reopen that issue.”

Prior to this, the party had allowed anti-choice votes by members of its caucus — members such as anti-LGBT equality rights and former Liberal MP Jim Karygiannis who has, unfortunately, gone on to become a Toronto City Councillor.

Obviously this has greatly angered the anti-choice movement as it left only one major party in parliament where caucus members were allowed to oppose women’s reproductive rights, the Conservative Party (and government). (The NDP has been explicitly pro-choice for many years now.)

In the leaflet, reproduced here, Justin Trudeau is literally portrayed as having blood on his shirt and collar. This is done next to an alleged image of an aborted fetus and above the slogan “Justin Trudeau Supports Abortion Until Birth.”

The leaflet states, “Abortions can happen in Canada until birth — and nearly 100,000 abortions happen every year”. It later reads, “A vote for Justin Trudeau is a vote for this” next to a highly dubious image of an alleged aborted (and supposedly disemboweled and beheaded) 20-week old fetus.

To call this framing of abortion in Canada profoundly misleading would be an understatement.

As the University of Ottawa notes:

Over 90 per cent of abortions in Canada are done in the first trimester; only two-three per cent are done after 16 weeks, and no doctor performs abortions past 20 or 21 weeks unless there are compelling health or genetic reasons. The risk of maternal mortality is probably greater in carrying a pregnancy to term (7.06 per 100 000 live births) than the risk associated with abortion (0.56 per 100 000 terminations)

To make this perfectly clear, “20 weeks is the cutoff for elective abortions according to the Canadian Medical Association” which means that any performed after this point are only done where the health of the mother is at risk or where the fetus is no longer viable or will not survive for any meaningful length of time after birth. The notion that abortions “can happen in Canada until birth” is simply false unless one is including abortions that are an established medical necessity.

Further, the overwhelming percentage of abortions in Canada occur prior to 16 weeks, with the greatest percentage of those occurring prior to 12 weeks. Only 3.3 per cent occur between 17-20 weeks while only 1.9 per cent occur after that — all of which would have been non-elective.

This disgraceful imagery, which, even if real, attempts to shock with medical photographs that are completely decontextualized (virtually any medical procedure could similarly be made to look shocking and disturbing presented a certain way) is also used by the group on the protest signs they carry at their demonstrations, including the ones outside of schools.

While I suspect that these tactics will backfire, they still need to be roundly condemned and so should the targeting of Justin Trudeau.

In ridings where there is a Conservative incumbent, such as mine (Bernard Trottier), the MP should be contacted and asked to state publicly where they stand on the leaflets and women’s reproductive rights.

The attack on Trudeau should also be forcefully condemned by New Democrats and leftists generally. Against them specifically he deserves our full support. While, especially with an election on the way, it is fashionable in some quarters to claim that the Liberals and Tories are the “same,” on the fundamentally important issue of full and unequivocal support for women’s reproductive rights and freedoms they are not.

These rights and freedoms are under constant attack across North America and there are outright opponents of them within the government caucus. Attempts to limit or in any way hinder access to abortion also, as the Critical Social Work Journal noted “most drastically affect marginalized women, “particularly those who are low-income, women of colour, immigrant or refugee women and those who do not speak English or French””

The issue is not a peripheral one. It remains a critical battleground in the fight for women’s rights and social justice and equality.

Opponents of these rights will stoop to any low to try to undermine them. We cannot allow them to succeed.

Michael LaxerMichael Laxer lives in Toronto where he runs a bookstore with his partner Natalie. Michael has a Degree in History from Glendon College of York University. He is a political activist, a two-time former candidate and former election organizer for the NDP, was a socialist candidate for Toronto City Council in 2014, and is on the executive of the Socialist Party of Ontario. His website is The Left Chapter.

 

Cover Photo: Alex Guibard

Guest Writer
Guest Writer

One of Feminist Current’s amazing guest writers.

Like this article? Tip Feminist Current!

$
Personal Info

Donation Total: $1

  • Derrington

    That is not a 10 wek embryo. At 10 weeks the arm buds are not visible and the emryo has only just got a heartbeat. This shit is propoganda. Maybe pro choice could print a pic of a real 10 week old embryo next to this version and suggest they stop legislating on stuff where they are falsifying basic evidence.

  • GwinnyB

    OK so copyright for these images belongs to The Grantham Collection and The Centre For Ethical Reform (surprise surprise) and are used here with written permission but that does not mean either that they are authentic or that consent was obtained from the parents of the aborted foetuses or the medical profession or, for that matter, the foetus itself. If, as the pro-life organisations above maintain, this is a baby, then as a minor, its right to privacy must be upheld and nude photos of it should not be distributed as roadkill porn. No?
    Also, I’ve just gooogled images of 12 week foetuses on both pro-life and neutral/miscarriage sites and the former are a gorefest with some highly-developed “victim” dolls even in praying pose whereas the latter show the reality, size and development of the foetuses although with some dolls, too.
    I terminated a pregnancy at 9 weeks 20 odd years ago and have not shed one tear or felt one iota of guilt or regret or sadness since. Never. It was a medical procedure I chose and that choice was the right one.

  • anne cameron

    I am disgusted by this ploy by the Cons. We have settled this matter, our present abortion laws are in place and are most decidedly not an open door to widespread slaughter. It’s also disgusting that the party who is rapaging around making noises about the unborn seems to forget about the children once they draw breath. They do not support increased social programmes, won’t pay for dental care, for eyeglasses, or even for wheelchairs. Once again the patriarchs want to control women’s bodies. I’m not a fan of Junior Trudeau and would never vote for him but this attack on him is sick.

  • An ACTUAL Rad Fem

    Too bad the NDP support legalizing the rape trade and supports Israel by pretending that Israel and Palestine are equally as guilty, hence obstructing the power dynamic between the two. If the NDP is left then I’m a peanut butter sandwich. It’s a no for me.

  • Meghan Murphy

    Testing – 1 – 2 – 3

    • Meghan Murphy

      Testing a Reply