Forum remembers Ecole Polytechnique, fights violence against women today

This article was originally published at rabble.ca

 

The 14 women killed at École Polytechnique in Montreal 22 years ago were remembered by over a hundred participants at a public education forum for ending violence against women, which took place at The Cultch on Vancouver’s East Side on Dec. 3, one of many such events across the country.

Fourteen other people, 10 women and four men, were also injured during the Montreal Massacre, which took place on Dec. 6, 1989.

Those gathered talked, listened, and strategized around women’s resistance to violence against women. The day was filled with sadness and strength, inspiration and frustration, as women discussed the power of women and the difficulties of combating gendered violence in a patriarchal world.

Many stories shared were very personal and while it was impossible not to connect one’s own lived experiences to that systematic abuse, the thread that ran throughout the day was about the responsibility political authority. As Daisy Kler, a member of the South Asian Coalition on Ending Violence Against Women, said: “Violence against women is a political issue. A question of power and domination, not an individual pathology.”

During a panel called “The State Betrayal of Battered Women,” Angela Marie MacDougall, of Battered Women’s Support Services (BWSS), pointed out that “colonization is at the heart of violence against women.” It was something participants were reminded of throughout the day as women discussed experiences of marginalization and violence directly related to Canada’s legacy of racism and of marginalization of Aboriginal women’s voices.

This point seemed particularly pertinent in light of B.C.’s Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Women, which continued, even after a number of women’s groups pulled out when funding for legal representation was denied.

That the voices of Aboriginal women and many of those who live in the Downtown Eastside were left out of the inquiry has led many to question whether or not the process would provide anything in terms of preventing further violence to marginalized women. Lee Lakeman, of Vancouver Rape Relief, said: “It’s important that you realize this is set up by the provincial government… and they could have, at any point, improved and expanded it. They still could.” This inquiry has continued without the voices of the women most affected.

So while, on one hand, women and women’s organizations desperately need state support in terms of funding, in terms of the way in which systems and processes are set up, in terms of dealing with violence against women, and in terms of simply naming this abuse as gendered, the state has never been a friend to women. Women rely on a system that has abandoned them many times over.

“At BWSS, there are over 9,500 requests each year and the requests of battered women remind us very much that it is the most pressing social issue of our time,” MacDougall said.

Women are made to, out of necessity, reach out to the state for help, she said, for safety and for justice and yet, when they do they are betrayed. We have, somehow, erased gender relations and power dynamics in areas like family law, which has adopted an approach of gender, class and race neutrality that makes it an extremely dangerous place for women to go for help, as often, it can compound the feeling of helplessness and silencing women already experience in situations of abuse.

“No state apparatus is working in favour of women,” Kler responded.

A panel which looked at prostitution as a form of violence against women, concluded the day. Lakeman said this gender neutrality which was in the process of infiltrating the law and state systems was also being forced into conversations around prostitution.

She said, in relation to the missing women inquiry, that some wanted the term “prostitute” replaced by the term “sex worker,” skipping over what she described as the key word: “woman.”

Lakeman added that police are required to acknowledge categories in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and, therefore, pay extra attention as well as offer protective support to women and, in particular, Aboriginal women.

“There is no category in the law called ‘sex worker.’ It may look like they’re pretending to be co-operative or respectful but what they’re really doing is getting out of their Charter obligation,” she said.

“When people press you to say ‘sex worker’ it’s really important that you know it isn’t just a matter of opinion — one [term] gets the authorities out of any accountability and one holds them accountable for the status of women and the status of Aboriginal people.”

Meghan Murphy
Meghan Murphy

Founder & Editor

Meghan Murphy is a freelance writer and journalist. She has been podcasting and writing about feminism since 2010 and has published work in numerous national and international publications, including New Statesman, Vice, Al Jazeera, The Globe and Mail, I-D, Truthdig, and more. Meghan completed a Masters degree in the department of Gender, Sexuality and Women’s Studies at Simon Fraser University in 2012 and lives in Vancouver, B.C. with her dog.

Like this article? Tip Feminist Current!

$
Personal Info

Donation Total: $1

  • Very good post, except for the part on prostitution, which is highly contradictory…

    • Meghan Murphy

      What is contradictory? First of all, the content around prostitution is what was actually discussed at the forum, so are you implying that it should not have been included? That seems inappropriate to me… Secondly, I don’t think it is contradictory at all that a topic such as prostitution would be discussed at a forum about violence against women. In fact, had this issue been left out, I believe that would be incongruous with the purpose and nature of the topics at hand and the feminist movement as a whole.

      • You blame legitimally the shitty state to be against women…but you ask the same shitty state to eradicate prostitution!

        • Meghan Murphy

          No David. Please read the article and respond appropriately. I have reported on events that actually happened. Words that were said. “I” have not asked the state to do anything. Nor are your claims accurate or relevant in terms of reality or of any debate that is taking place within the feminist movement.

          • So, you don’t ask the State to do anything, except more police for your abolitionnism?

          • Meghan Murphy

            David. Read the article. Women must reach out to the state and yet are betrayed by the state. Your comments are not relevant to the piece. Stop trolling.

  • Okay, I re-read it.

    So… I’m sorry and I even agreeing with you (yeah, prostitution is not a good thing, but we should try to establish new economic conditions that eradicate prostitution, not policing
    more this industry), but many abolitionnists support more police state for the sake of abolition. So I was confused…

    • I am in no way pro-police. However, I get tired of people, especially men who benefit from women living in a culture of fear, telling women that we can’t do anything about prostitution, pornography, or rape in its various forms because it involves the state. In a way, I feel like this is saying, “do nothing.” Anyone who has spent time in the anarchist “community” knows damn well that men get away with rape. Only sometimes do women and a few men try to hold known rapists accountable. I can think of loads of examples of this.

      Until anarchists in all their various stripes are able to deal with sexual violence, women should not be told we need to come up with better solutions than calling the cops.

      What we need is a real commitment from all men to end sexual violence; if this commitment were truly there, there would be no need to call the cops about sexual assaults; in the rare case of a sexual assault occurring, the assaulter would be swiftly punished, in any number of ways, from the community.

      For a better world,
      WOAJ

      • I support you concerning rape. But here, we talked about prostitution (the same applies to pornography) which CANNOT be eradicated if we try to reform capitalism.

        “What we need is a real commitment from all men to end sexual violence;”

        “Until anarchists in all their various stripes are able to deal with sexual violence, women should not be told we need to come up with better solutions than calling the cops. ”

        Cops are not a solution against prostitution, but they’re a good temporary solution against rape.

        The state will never give you this commitment. I don’t know any non-policitician non rapist men who aren’t
        committed against rape. In the case of domestic violence however, this commitment should be joined by a
        commitment by all women to end marriages, procreation, monogamy and sexual preference for women-beaters and thugs, and I don’t think statist feminists want to make that move.